最終更新日:2026-10-09 17:59:49
Reading time: About 4 minutes
Different threats call for different protection capabilities. This topic lists typical application scenarios for Flood Shield 2.0, helping you determine which category your business falls into, which capabilities to enable, and how protection takes effect in each scenario.
| Application scenario | Typical threats | Main capabilities to enable |
|---|---|---|
| Websites, web applications, and APIs | HTTP Flood, credential stuffing, automated bot scraping | WAF Protection, Bot Management, API Security, L7 DDoS protection |
| TCP/UDP services such as gaming, live streaming, and real-time communication | SYN Flood, UDP Flood, reflection amplification | L3/L4 DDoS protection (onboarded through Non-Website Protection) |
| Traffic peaks from promotions, live streaming, and product launches | Bursts of legitimate traffic mixed with attack requests | Traffic baseline modeling, dynamic thresholds, elastic resource scaling |
| Business systems facing constantly changing attack methods | Combined L3–L7 attacks | Unified cross-layer policies and coordinated protection |
Scenario characteristics: Your business is hit by high-volume attacks at the network and transport layers, such as SYN Flood, UDP Flood, and various reflection amplification attacks. These attacks aim to consume bandwidth and connection resources; once bandwidth is saturated, legitimate users can no longer establish connections.
Capabilities enabled:
Outcome: Attacks are scrubbed before they reach the origin server, leaving origin bandwidth and connection resources unaffected.
Scenario characteristics: Attackers target the application layer directly through HTTP/HTTPS requests, for example HTTP Flood, API abuse, credential stuffing, and automated bot scraping. These requests look much like legitimate traffic, so network-layer protection alone cannot identify them.
Capabilities enabled:
Outcome: Legitimate users see no change in their experience, while application-layer attack requests are accurately identified and blocked.
Scenario characteristics: Attackers often combine high-volume attacks with application-layer attacks to amplify the impact and bypass protection at a single layer. With only one layer protected, you may encounter a situation where network-layer traffic looks normal while the application layer is already saturated.
Capabilities enabled:
Use when: Your business system faces constantly changing attack methods, or combined attacks have already occurred.
Scenario characteristics: Online gaming, real-time communication, and custom-protocol services run over TCP/UDP and do not use HTTP/HTTPS, so web security solutions cannot cover them.
Capabilities enabled:
Outcome: Web and non-web services are onboarded and protected on the same platform, with no need to maintain two separate solutions.
Scenario characteristics: Promotions, live streaming, and product launches drive traffic far above daily levels. The curve of burst traffic resembles that of attack requests, so a policy that judges by fixed thresholds may falsely block a legitimate business peak.
Capabilities enabled:
Outcome: Access stays stable during business peaks, and legitimate users are not affected by protection policies.
Why does burst traffic not get confused with attack requests?
The deciding factor is whether the traffic matches the existing baseline: traffic that follows historical patterns is allowed as legitimate business, while traffic that clearly deviates from the baseline is treated as an attack. Newly onboarded businesses lack historical data, so run in Monitor Mode for 3–7 days to build the baseline first, and switch to Protection Mode once you have confirmed there are no false positives.